Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carlos Taberner vs Mariano Kestelboim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Taberner vs Kestelboim analysis and find out who is favored!
Carlos Taberner vs Mariano Kestelboim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Taberner 1 - 0 Kestelboim
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Taberner has won 48.7% of points on their second serve, while Kestelboim has won 48.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Taberner, in recent form, has won 57.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kestelboim has won 60.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.62% and 43.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Taberner has saved 55.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kestelboim has saved 54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Taberner has won 54.67% of matches played (W/L 41/ 34), with Kestelboim winning 66.04% (W/L 35/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Taberner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 363/ 200), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Kestelboim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 326/ 213), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 33/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Taberner has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 39/ 33), where as Kestelboim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 26/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Taberner winning 1 times and Kestelboim being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Taberner winning 2 and Kestelboim winning 1. The last match between Taberner and Kestelboim was at the Romania F7, 25-06-2016, Final, Clay with Carlos Taberner getting the victory 6-1 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Taberner and Kestelboim have played a deciding set 1 times, with Taberner winning 1 times and Kestelboim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Taberner winning 0, and Kestelboim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Taberner has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.75 while Kestelboim has played against players with an average rank of 234.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Taberner has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kestelboim has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Taberner has converted 50.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kestelboim has converted 49.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
309
Rank
85
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
549
Rank
387
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
62% (411-253)
Career Total W/L
60% (359-237)
54% (20-17)
YTD W/L
68% (17-8)
$466,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Taberner VS Kestelboim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Carlos Taberner | Mariano Kestelboim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:57:0 | 2:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (69/112) | 76% (58/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (45/69) | 62% (36/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (18/43) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 27% (4/15) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (35/76) | 44% (49/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Taberner VS Kestelboim H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Carlos Taberner
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carlos Taberner | Mariano Kestelboim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (20/17) | 68% (17/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (45/37) | 66% (35/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (413/370) | 60% (272/185) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (19/14) | 68% (17/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 102 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:50 | 1:48:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 238.03 | 201.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1497/2417) | 68% (975/1442) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (963/1497) | 65% (630/975) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (448/920) | 49% (227/467) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (147/292) | 50% (112/225) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1107/2463) | 50% (748/1504) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (18/16) | 58% (7/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (19/36) | 67% (16/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (16/1) | 11% (9/1) |
Carlos Taberner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Carlos Taberner
73%
(
91 of
125)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
59 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Michael Vrbensky
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Moez Echargui
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Matej Dodig
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Carlos Taberner
43%
(
27 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Carlos Taberner
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Ignacio Buse
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Alexander Weis
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Arthur Weber
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mariano Kestelboim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
57%
(
34 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Valentin Basel
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Tomas Tischner
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Ignacio Carou
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Taberner Vs Kestelboim Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
